+86-731-82246688
Contact Us
Please leave your contact information so that we can handle your request. Thank you for your attention.
Your name
Your email
Phone
Your company
Address
requirement type
Message
NIR vs Broadband Absorption in Laser Marking: Why Absorption Type Matters More Than Absorption Strength
发布时间:2026-01-12Hit:92
               

In laser marking, the difference between NIR-selective absorption and broadband absorption matters more than how strongly a material absorbs laser energy. Broadband absorbers convert energy into heat across a wide spectral range, which often results in diffuse heating, melt flow, or bulk degradation before a stable optical contrast can form. In contrast, NIR-responsive systems concentrate absorption near the laser wavelength, which promotes localized energy deposition and a more constrained material response. As a result, similar absorption levels can produce very different marking outcomes depending on how absorbed energy is converted and confined. Successful laser marking depends on the pathway from absorption to material response, not absorption magnitude alone.


Mechanism: How the Effect Occurs

Laser marking begins with photon absorption, but the marking outcome is determined by what happens after absorption. Broadband absorbers interact with light across a wide range of wavelengths and convert absorbed energy primarily into heat. That heat spreads laterally and into the bulk through the polymer matrix, therefore raising temperature over a broad volume rather than at a constrained surface zone. As a result, the polymer softens, flows, or degrades in an uncontrolled way, and any potential contrast-carrying surface change is diluted by volumetric heating. NIR-responsive absorbers behave differently because their absorption is concentrated near the laser wavelength, which tends to localize energy deposition in the irradiated region. When conversion remains spatially confined, the polymer response is more controlled, enabling localized chemical change, microstructural modification, or scattering/reflectance differences that generate visible contrast. The key distinction is not absorption efficiency, but whether absorbed energy remains confined long enough to support a contrast-forming pathway instead of being dissipated as diffuse heat.

Common Failure Modes

Laser marking failures occur when broadband absorption produces heat without a contrast-forming pathway, therefore allowing energy dissipation to overwhelm any surface-localized transformation. Engineers then observe blurred edges, weak grayscale contrast, or geometry-dependent variability because the heat-affected zone expands beyond the region where optical differentiation could be stabilized. Another common failure mode appears when higher absorption increases melt depth instead of surface modification: as melt flow, shrinkage, or gas evolution enlarges the mod



For an application-scoped example of an NIR-responsive laser marking system that emphasizes localized energy conversion rather than broadband photothermal heating, read more on LaserMark W.


Disclaimer: This article is an integrated content, copyright belongs to the original author, the purpose of reprinting is to convey more information, does not represent the views of this platform. If related to the content of the work, copyright and other problems, please contact this website message, we will delete the content in the first time.