Graphene nanoplatelets (GNP) control ESD/anti-static behavior by creating a percolated conductive network in the polymer; charge dissipation then occurs through platelet contacts and tunneling gaps. The practical window is set by network continuity, contact resistance, and processing-driven platelet alignment.
This application note explains how graphene nanoplatelets (GNP) form a percolation network in polymer matrices to achieve stable electrostatic dissipation and controlled volume resistivity in ESD and anti-static plastics.
This page explains how graphene nanoplatelets (GNP) are used in polymer compounds to achieve stable static dissipation and controlled volume resistivity, including the percolation mechanism, processing constraints, and comparison to carbon black.
Graphene nanoplatelets (GNP) are plate-like conductive fillers that can form overlapping networks at relatively low volume fraction when platelet aspect ratio and spacing favor contact and near-contact pathways. In ESD polymers, this supports a controllable transition from insulating behavior to a static-dissipative regime.
Mechanistically, the conduction is typically contact- and tunneling-limited (not metallic bulk conduction), so interfacial resistance, platelet overlap probability, and polymer dielectric spacing dominate the measured resistivity window.
Non-Applicability: Graphene nanoplatelets (GNP) are not a reliable single-additive solution when the design requires ultra-low, metal-like resistivity (very low ohmic paths) across complex 3D geometries; the network remains contact-limited and geometry-dependent.
Unknown/Unverified: long-term drift of ESD resistivity under repeated wash/wipe/abrasion cycles is highly formulation- and surface-condition-dependent; for a given polymer/finish, stability must be validated on real parts rather than inferred from plaques.
Activation Boundary: below the effective electrical percolation threshold (after compounding and molding), charge dissipation collapses and the part behaves as an insulator; the practical boundary is the post-process percolation state, not the nominal dosing target.
This explanation follows established conductive-composite theory (percolation, contact resistance, tunneling) and known processing effects (shear alignment, network breakup). Numeric thresholds are grade-, matrix-, and process-specific and should be treated as design variables rather than constants.
Last Updated: