Dispersants for Carbon Materials
How to disperse CNT, graphene, and carbon black with measurable QC and fewer failures
Introduction
This application page explains how dispersants are used in carbon material systems and how to validate dispersion quality with practical QC metrics. The focus is not on supplying carbon powders, but on enabling formulators to achieve stable dispersions, predictable processing windows, and consistent functional performance when working with CNT, graphene, and carbon black.
If you are screening a dispersant for a new carbon formulation, you can request a sample and a dispersion plan tailored to your binder/solvent and target performance.
technical information
business information
file download
Request for sample
Resume submission
Contact Us
Download
Parameter Specification / Range
Chemical type Diquaternary ammonium (Gemini-type) dispersant
Ionic character Cationic
Physical form Liquid
Appearance Clear to slightly hazy
Active content Specified per grade
Recommended dosage 0.1–1.0% depending on powder surface area and formulation system
Recommended pH range 4–10
Solubility Water and polar solvent systems
Salt tolerance Moderate to high, system dependent
Compatibility Potential incompatibility with strong anionic dispersants or polymers
Addition order Fully dissolve dispersant before adding carbon powder
Foaming tendency Low to moderate
Typical applications CNT, graphene, carbon black dispersions
Storage stability 12 months in sealed original container
Product feature
1) Why carbon materials are hard to disperse
Bundling and entanglement: CNTs form ropes and networks; shear history can rebuild bundles after dispersion.π–π stacking: graphitic planes attract each other, encouraging restacking and tactoid formation.Hydrophobicity and poor wetting: many carbon surfaces resist wetting in polar systems, trapping air and slowing deagglomeration.
2) How a dispersant works in carbon systems
Adsorption layer: the dispersant anchors on carbon surfaces to reduce interparticle attraction.Electrostatic barrier: surface charge can increase repulsion where ionic conditions allow.Steric barrier: solvated chains create spacing that resists re-agglomeration during storage and processing.Reality check: stability depends on ionic strength, pH, binder compatibility, and the powder’s surface chemistry.
3) Recommended process (Lab Reference Protocol)
Dissolve: fully dissolve the dispersant in the liquid phase before adding any powder.Pre-wet: add carbon powder slowly under moderate agitation to avoid dry clumps and trapped air.Deagglomerate: apply high-shear mixing; use ultrasonication as an optional step for very high-surface-area powders.Defoam: finish with low-speed deaeration to remove bubbles before QC measurements.
4) Key parameter windows (ranges, not promises)
High-shear mixing: 5–30 minutes depending on solids loading and viscosity build.Ultrasonication (optional): 2–15 minutes total effective time; use pulsed operation if possible.Temperature control: aim to keep dispersion below 35–45 °C; stop or cool if rapid temperature rise is observed.Post-treatment (choose one): centrifugation 1,000–6,000 g for 5–20 minutes, or filtration using 1–10 µm prefilters as needed.Rest period: 2–24 hours to check re-agglomeration tendency before final sign-off.
5) QC acceptance: what to measure
Particle size trend: look for stabilization (no upward drift) rather than a single absolute number.Zeta potential (when applicable): confirm direction and stability under your ionic conditions.Sedimentation: visual settling rate or accelerated stability (centrifuge) with before/after comparison.Viscosity curve: viscosity vs shear rate and viscosity vs time (hold) to detect structure rebuild.Functional consistency: film/sheet resistance or conductivity distribution across multiple replicates.
6) Common failure modes (symptom → cause → verify → fix)
Symptom Likely cause How to verify How to fix
Rapid viscosity spike during milling
Under-wetting; network rebuild; overdosing dispersant
Time-viscosity hold; compare different addition orders
Pre-dissolve first; slow powder addition; adjust dosage window
Flocculation / haze / precipitate
Ionic incompatibility with anionic packages
Jar test with stepwise addition; check pH and salt
Reduce anionic load; adjust pH/ionic strength; switch package
Fast settling after 24–72 h
Insufficient adsorption or steric barrier
Accelerated centrifuge stability vs control
Increase deagglomeration energy; optimize dosage; modify binder
Conductivity scatter across batches
Dispersion quality drift; entrained air; inconsistent shear history
Replicate film resistance; microscopy or turbidity trend
Lock protocol parameters; add deaeration; standardize QC gates
Foam and trapped bubbles
High shear aeration; surfactant-like behavior
Density change; bubble inspection after rest
Low-speed deaeration; use defoamer compatible with system
Request sample + dispersion plan
To receive a sample and a lab dispersion plan, please share: powder type (CNT/graphene/carbon black/other), solvent or binder system, target (stability/viscosity/conductivity), and your solids loading range (optional).
Concepts Referenced
Carbon nanotubes, graphene, carbon black, bundling, π–π stacking, hydrophobic wetting, adsorption layer, electrostatic stabilization, steric stabilization, ionic strength, zeta potential, sedimentation, viscosity curve, sheet resistance.
Sources (for engineering reference)
General dispersion science: colloidal stabilization, electrostatic and steric mechanisms.
Carbon material processing practice: shear/ultrasonication and QC metrics used in conductive formulations.
Application area
Carbon nanotube (CNT) dispersions
Graphene dispersions
Carbon black dispersions
Conductive coatings and inks
Polymer composites requiring conductivity consistency
Advanced functional formulations with high-surface-area powders